On 12 April 2013 23:09, Lars T. Kyllingstad <pub...@kyllingen.net> wrote:
> On Friday, 12 April 2013 at 13:00:36 UTC, Robert wrote: > >> I would suggest, instead of writing your own std.process, that you >> simply provide a pull request to the now to be approved one, this way >> you can prove your point that it is easy by already improving a part of >> the standard library. >> > > Actually, Manu (or anyone) could do this for *any* part of Phobos. And > considering that std.process is probably the module that would benefit the > least from it, maybe he should start somewhere else? std.string, perhaps, > or std.algorithm? > I think I'll have a go at this after dconf. For now, I need to stop distracting myself from my lecture preparation! ;)
