On Sunday, 14 April 2013 at 07:06:12 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij
wrote:
For "working signals" I suppose will be enough fixing of both
Issue 9606 [1] and Issue 9603 [2].
IMO, for the first issue we need weak references [3].
IMO, for the second issue we need to make regular D objects on
closures [4] and fix Issue 9602 [5].
Any thoughts about my proposal to make signals working in D?
Other proposals? Any (approximate) period for [proposal parts]
to be implemented?
Also, does anybody think currently D has working signals and
I'm just slander in the title?
P.S.
Also there is a proposal for new signals implementation without
compiler changes [6].
[1] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9606
[2] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9603
[3] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4151
[4] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9601
[5] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9602
[6] http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9347
Can you expand yourself on the subject ? I did followed
discussion on the topic, and so this thread is quite hard to
follow.
