18.04.2013 18:21, deadalnix пишет:
On Thursday, 18 April 2013 at 13:25:32 UTC, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
- What is the fundamental problem.
When a delegate is created information about it's outer scope is lost
instead of being stored in it's ptr.
That doesn't mean anything. No information is stored into a ptr except
an address in memory.
A joke? Of course I mean "stored into a memory ptr point to".
- Why this fundamental problem is a language issue and not a lib one.
...
I don't care about the cost. You have made no point in 3 pages in favor
of the change you propose. Not even an invalid point I can disagree on.
As everything I have written above is known, I still don't understand
why you are telling about signal fixing as a main problem as it is
just an example of problems that occurs when we throw away outer scope
information without any practical reason, IMO.
It is an example of a library interface issue (very real). To propose a
language change, you must show that this limitation is in fact a symptom
of a deeper cause, which it at language level (so that must be fixed at
language level).
Another try to describe the problem:
When I get a delegate, I'd like to use it unless it become invalid.
--
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij
