On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 06:41:36 UTC, Chris Cain wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 at 06:24:24 UTC, Mehrdad wrote:
The trouble is that you've already failed before you started.
Also, I'm assuming that this means that you had no intention of
learning.
I could tell you the same thing, but it wouldn't get me anywhere.
All I'm saying is that structs are really basic for a reason.
They're something you _build_ on.
Then they shouldn't define a behavior for == in the first place.
No behavior is better than wrong behavior.
