On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 00:34:54 Diggory wrote: > If at some point custom attributes will be allowed, @ would be a > nice syntax for that. > > Things like @safe could be attributes implemented by the standard > library - would cut down on the number of keywords.
We already have custom attributes using @. They're called User Defined Attributes and were added a couple releases ago IIRC. - Jonathan M Davis
