On Wednesday, 24 April 2013 at 08:23:57 UTC, Manu wrote:
Okay, I understand the problem now. I'm sure it's possible to
address these
issues, but I see the complexity in that case.
Is it worth doing so? Will it be taken seriously, or will
another reason to
dismiss it appear?
I can't talk for Walter, but let me tell what I'd say if I was
him.
The issue is worth considering. However, clearly in a 2 step
process :
- Ensuring lifetime safety.
- In a second step, ensuring rvalue ref binding when it is safe
(this include many consideration about temporary lifetime that
aren't trivial as you can see).
I'd give priority to #1 as it seems like a major hole in D right
now. But #2, even if truly important, solve a problem that isn't
as fundamental, and incurs a fair amount of complexity, so I'd
delay it until some core recurring problems are sorted out.
