On 5/4/2013 10:15 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Just the factual events. We all said repeatedly in the beginning of the discussion that "we focus only on the safety aspect for now and then figure the rvalue references thing". I've heard you say it at least two times clear as day. We can't now construe a solution to the safety matter into a solution to binding rvalues to ref.
Yes, I should have entitled the thread that it was a solution to the safety issue. I agree that we deferred the 'nop' issue.
