On Friday, 10 May 2013 at 00:08:50 UTC, Manu wrote:
As I've had to re-iterate countless times, and such is the
massive fallacy
behind all of these threads, this whole debate is NOT about
lvalues/rvalues, and I wish people would stop using the term
'rvalue' in
their posts, I worry that they misunderstand the problem every
time it's
said.
This code is broken:
void f(ref int x) {}
int x;
f(x);
x is an lvalue.
There's nothing broken about that code. In what way do you
believe it is broken?
The problem we need to solve is that of a function being able
to safely
receive a _temporary_.
temporary = rvalue
