In article <mailman.1186.1368236482.4724.digitalmar...@puremagic.com>, jmdavisp...@gmx.com says... > > On Friday, May 10, 2013 17:14:01 H. S. Teoh wrote: > > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 05:09:18PM -0700, Walter Bright wrote: > > > On 5/10/2013 4:27 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote: > > > >Seriously, D has so spoiled me I can't stand programming in another > > > >language these days. :-P > > > > > > Me too. Sometimes it makes it hard to work on the dmd front end! > > > > Now, *that* is not a good thing at all! When are we going to start > > moving towards bootstrapping D? Did any conclusions ever come of that > > discussion some time ago about how this might impact GDC/LDC? > > Daniel Murphy (yebblies) has an automated C++ to D converted for the > front-end > that he's been working on (which won't work on general C++ code but works on > the front-end's code), and he's been making pull requests to dmd to adjust > the > code so that it's more easily converted. So, once he's done with that, it'll > be trivial to have the same compiler in both C++ and D (with all of the > changes going in the C++ code), and we can maintain it that way until we're > ready to go pure D. And after that, we can start refactoring the D code and > take advantage of what D can do. > > - Jonathan M Davis
What's your point?