On Friday, 24 May 2013 at 13:05:36 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Max Samukha:
Note that the Nullable is not phobos Nullable -
the latter incurs unnecessary overhead for types that are
already nullable.
In Bugzilla I have suggested some improvements for Nullable,
but in Phobos there is already an alternative Nullable that
avoids that overhead:
struct Nullable(T, T nullValue);
Bye,
bearophile
The question is what should be the result of:
Nullable(int*)?
Nullable!(Nullable!T)?
Forbidden (like in C#)? Aliased to the source type? A distinct
type?
