On Sunday, 26 May 2013 at 12:55:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 5/26/2013 4:31 AM, Joakim wrote:
My single-byte encoding has none of these problems, in fact,
it's much faster
and uses less memory for the same function, while providing
additional speedups,
from the header, that are not available to UTF-8.
C'mon, Joakim, show us this amazing strstr() implementation for
your scheme!
You will see it when it's built into a fully working single-byte
encoding implementation. I don't write toy code, particularly
inefficient functions like yours, for the reasons given, which
seem to have gone over your head.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhRUe-gz690
Heh, never seen that sketch before. Never understood why anyone
likes this silly Monty Python stuff, from what little I've seen.
