On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 18:14:59 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 16:18:34 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
On Monday, 27 May 2013 at 15:22:21 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
Am I the only person that worries greatly about the length of
symbols in D?
———
<snip>
———
That's 13 kilobytes of data for a single symbol name!
The symbols typically contain a lot of repeated sub strings.
Perhaps there is a better mangling scheme that encodes it with
some kind of prefix tree?
The way template are mangled in super redundant. This can
probably be fixed easily, but this is a breakage.
