hasen wrote:
You just have to look at the name to see that it doesn't really work on Windows: it requires a Unix emulation layer (msys in your case, others do it with cygwin) which a lot of people won't want to install/use.Leandro Lucarella wrote:"Jérôme M. Berger", el 31 de mayo a las 19:03 me escribiste:Leandro Lucarella wrote:Git is a bad choice because of its poor Windows support. Mercurial or Bazaar are much better in this regard.Well, that's great to hear! As Robert said, please tell if you need anyhelp. Please, please, please consider using a distributed SCM (I think gitwould be ideal but mercurial is good too). That would make merging and branching a lot easier.That's a mith, Git is pretty much supported in Windows now. I know people that uses it in a regular basis. See: http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/Yea, I use git on windows (msysgit), works like a charm. +1 for git
JeromePS: I usually use Linux at home and Windows at work. I do have msys installed on the Windows machine and I don't consider it really usable (the only reason I have it is to compile open source autoconf-based packages). Mercurial (or Bazaar) work in a standard Windows command shell as well as inside a cygwin/msys shell or any of the alternative shells if you prefer.
-- mailto:jeber...@free.fr http://jeberger.free.fr Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature