On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 09:26:09AM -0400, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > On 6/8/13 3:30 AM, Jakob Ovrum wrote: > >On Friday, 7 June 2013 at 22:52:47 UTC, Brad Anderson wrote: > >>Found the description of the process: > >>http://wiki.dlang.org/Review/Process > >> > >>It's somewhat vague and could probably use some standard announcement > >>templates people could use. > >> > >>Looks like it's actually two weeks of review, one week of voting. > >>I still think the module author should be able to be Review Manager > >>though. > > > >It mentions that after review, it is up to the review manager whether or > >not to continue with a vote. That seems like a big conflict-of-interest > >decision. > > Why? The review manager does not have a particular interest in > getting the proposal accepted or refused; the role is there just to > ensure a fair process. [...]
If the review manager is also the author, wouldn't he have particular interest in getting the proposal accepted? T -- There are four kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics.