Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Yigal Chripun wrote:your abstraction inversion example doesn't apply here. The problem I see is the narrowing implicit cast, i.e. int values behave like booleans. I have no problem with the reverse which is what your example is about.An int does not convert to bool implicitly. An int can be tested with "if", which is a different thing.Andrei
that is an implicit cast.
what I'm saying is that:
int a = .. ;
if (a) { .. }
this should be a compiler error IMO.
