Well, that's why I've said we don't have a statement that uses
comma to separate it's part. We have lists (argument list,
initializer list, array literals, etc) and I would keep comma for
separating list items.
In for and foreach we use semi-colons, so I tought that using
semi-colon in in would be more consistent than comma.
But that's just my opinion and if this feature got implemented I
would be happy with commas also. :)
On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 at 05:46:35 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little
wrote:
Or the comma operator:
int x = (5, 3); // x is 3
Arrays:
int[] x = [3, 5];
Struct initializers:
struct t { int x, y };
auto z = t(3, 5);
Variable declarations:
int x = 5, y = 3;
I'm not sure which would be more idiomatic though... I'm
leaning more towards commas though, to keep with the syntax of
the initializers.
On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 at 05:28:07 UTC, Manu wrote:
What about the argument list only 3 characters earlier?
On 18 June 2013 15:16, Aleksandar Ruzicic
<aleksan...@ruzicic.info> wrote:
On Sunday, 16 June 2013 at 00:19:37 UTC, Manu wrote:
Super awesome idea! How about coma separated expressions to
perform
multiple asserts?
int func(int i, int j) in(i<5, j<10)
{
return i + j;
}
I find use of comma inside of parentheses of a statement a
bit unusual.
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think there is a single
statement in D
that separates it's "parts" with a comma. It's always a
semi-colon.
So I think it should be:
int func(int i, int j) in (i < 5; j < 10)
{
return i + j;
}
But either comma or a semi-colon used as a separator, this is
a really
nice syntactic sugar!
