On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 at 14:18:19 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
[...]Just make RNGs passed by reference, and the above problem will nothappen. T
Well... it's more than *just* pass-by-reference, its actual store-by-reference (eg "reference semantic").
In the case of "take", take store a copy of the passed range, so a pass-by-reference wouldn't really change much.
I'm not sure if that's what you meant, but just in case. We don't want any ambiguity on the words we are using.
