On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 13:47:19 Timon Gehr wrote: > Good point, but takeExactly currently is not a better choice due to its > poor quality of implementation.
What's the problem with takeExactly's implementation? - Jonathan M Davis
On Tuesday, June 25, 2013 13:47:19 Timon Gehr wrote: > Good point, but takeExactly currently is not a better choice due to its > poor quality of implementation.
What's the problem with takeExactly's implementation? - Jonathan M Davis