On 06/26/2013 10:06 PM, Marco Leise wrote: > Does it mean 16 extra bytes for every allocation ? > yes, or wrap it, and you have 4 or 8 bytes, but yes you would to have save it somewhere
- why allocators are not discussed here cybervadim
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here H. S. Teoh
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Adam D. Ruppe
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here H. S. Teoh
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Robert Schadek
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Dmitry Olshansky
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Robert Schadek
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Marco Leise
- Re: why allocators are not discussed her... Robert Schadek
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here cybervadim
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here bearophile
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here cybervadim
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Adam D. Ruppe
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Adam D. Ruppe
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Dmitry Olshansky
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Jacob Carlborg
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Dmitry Olshansky
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here H. S. Teoh
- Re: why allocators are not discussed here Brian Rogoff