bearophile wrote: >> The following code even crashes LDC during the compilation, I'll ask in >> the LDC channel:< > > The good ChristianK has already added it: > http://www.dsource.org/projects/ldc/ticket/320
And thankfully Frits van Bommel has already fixed it: it consumes about 40kb of heap memory at runtime now. This seems to be because we don't use the _d_arrayappend functions at all but emit a _d_arraysetlength instead. What's the memory growing behavior of that function? Should this be considered a bug?
