//===SIMD=== 0 1.#INF 5 1.#INF <-- vector result hnsecs: 100006 <-- duration time 0 1.#INF 5 1.#INF hnsecs: 90005 0 1.#INF 5 1.#INF hnsecs: 90006 //===SCALAR=== 0 1.#INF 5 1.#INF hnsecs: 90005 0 1.#INF 5 1.#INF hnsecs: 100005 0 1.#INF 5 1.#INF hnsecs: 100006
Alright, I'm now officially building for Windows x64 (amd64).
I've created this early benchmark http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/eae0233e
to explore SIMD performance. As you can see below, on my machine
there is almost zero difference. Am I missing something?
- Re: SIMD on Windows Manu
- Re: SIMD on Windows Walter Bright
- Re: SIMD on Windows Manu
- Re: SIMD on Windows Michael
- Re: SIMD on Windows Rainer Schuetze
- Re: SIMD on Windows Manu
- Re: SIMD on Windows Jacob Carlborg
- Re: SIMD on Windows Rainer Schuetze
- Re: SIMD on Windows Michael
- Re: SIMD on Windows Rainer Schuetze
- Re: SIMD on Windows Jonathan Dunlap
- Re: SIMD on Windows jerro
- Re: SIMD on Windows Jonathan Dunlap
- Re: SIMD on Windows Iain Buclaw
- Re: SIMD on Windows jerro
- Re: SIMD on Windows jerro
- Re: SIMD on Windows Jonathan Dunlap
- Re: SIMD on Windows jerro
- Re: SIMD on Windows Jonathan Dunlap
- Re: SIMD on Windows Manu
- Re: SIMD on Windows Jonathan Dunlap