On 7/1/13, JS <js.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > But yet absolutely useless and does nothing over using a field > directly.
Not completely useless, this syntax would theoretically disallow taking the address of such a field.
On 7/1/13, JS <js.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > But yet absolutely useless and does nothing over using a field > directly.
Not completely useless, this syntax would theoretically disallow taking the address of such a field.