Maybe make the arrays public? it's conceivable the optimiser could eliminate all that code, since it can prove the results are never referenced... I doubt that's the problem though, just a first guess.
On 2 July 2013 09:14, Jonathan Dunlap <jad...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jerro, I went ahead and used a pointer reference to ensure it's > being saved back into the array > (http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/**52710926<http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/52710926>). > Two things: > 1) still showing zero time delta > 2) On windows 7 x74, using a SAMPLE_AT size of 30000 or higher will cause > the program to immediately quit with no output at all. Even the first > statement of writeln in the constructor doesn't execute. >
