Re: UFCS and constructors

[John Colvin]

On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 03:22:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
That is _very_ broken IMHO. It makes no sense for parens to be 
optional with
opCall. The whole point of opCall is to overload the parens!

So much about optional parenthesis is broken. I really wish 
things weren't going that way, it obfusticates the difference 
between a callable and the result in a really nasty way, and it 
doesn't work for function pointers (nor does UFCS unfortunately).