On Thursday, 4 July 2013 at 00:52:13 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
Also, I think [] should have a singleton type as well. Currently it is a void[] with special implicit conversion rules.
+1
- [:] as empty associative array literal, plus warning f... bearophile
- Re: [:] as empty associative array literal, plus ... deadalnix
- Re: [:] as empty associative array literal, p... bearophile
- Re: [:] as empty associative array litera... Dicebot
- Re: [:] as empty associative array li... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: [:] as empty associative arr... Timon Gehr
- Re: [:] as empty associative... Henning Pohl
- Re: [:] as empty associative... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: [:] as empty associa... Jonathan M Davis
- Re: [:] as empty associative arr... Dicebot
- Re: [:] as empty associative... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: [:] as empty associative array litera... Diggory
- Re: [:] as empty associative array li... Regan Heath
- Re: [:] as empty associative array litera... deadalnix
- Re: [:] as empty associative array literal, plus ... TommiT
- Re: [:] as empty associative array literal, p... bearophile
- Re: [:] as empty associative array litera... bearophile
