On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 13:46:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:05:35AM +0200, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 9 July 2013 at 03:03:34 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>More to the point, *if* typeinfo isn't meant to match == for
>whatever
>reason, then why is it being used as the standard of
>comparison for
>AA keys?
>
I guess we need NaN == NaN to be true for AA keys, no ?
Not according to:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=7836
So, should NaN == NaN for AA keys, or not?
T
I think it was not decided yet. From language coherency point of
view NaN != NaN like in general case, from usefulness perspective
you don't need several nans in AA array.
