On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:02 PM, deadalnix <deadal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 July 2013 at 04:32:12 UTC, Timothee Cour wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:14 PM, Walter Bright >> <newshou...@digitalmars.com>**wrote: >> >> On 7/16/2013 8:49 PM, Timothee Cour wrote: >>> >>> So how about a library solution instead, which doesn't require compiler >>>> change: >>>> >>>> >>> While semantically a great idea, technically I don't think CTFE is up to >>> implementing a C front end yet. >>> >>> >> it would trivially, with CTFE exec. >> Yet another enabling use case. >> > > Just because a bad solution is faster to implement doesn't make it good. > Being lazy is good. Less bugs to fix, etc.
