Frits van Bommel wrote:
Don wrote:
For bonus points:
[end of message]
I guess nobody'll be getting those bonus points then... :P
<g>
For bonus points:
Code like the following is also almost certainly a bug:
byte b = -1;
if (b == 255) ... // FALSE!
When variable of byte or short type is compared with a positive literal
of value > byte.max or short.max respectively, or when an ubyte or
ushort is compared with a negative literal, it's pretty much the same
situation.
Flagging an error for this situation would typically reveal the root
cause: b should have been 'ubyte', not 'byte'.
