On Friday, 9 August 2013 at 00:34:31 UTC, JS wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:55:04 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Thursday, 8 August 2013 at 17:35:02 UTC, JS wrote:
Can we have UFCS for templates?
e.g.,
T New(T, A...)(A args) { }
T t = T.New(args);
Note, in this case, the type parameter is substituted.
As always, providing motivating use case and advantage/cost
comparison is usual requirement to make something happen.
DIP's exist for a reason.
Are you not smart enough to come up with use cases yourself?
This is not some extremely rare thing that might be used 1 in
10^100.
Even while agreeing the proposal is a good you succeed in looking
bad to me. Dude, the world do not revolve around you. Deal with
it.
