On Saturday, 10 August 2013 at 01:33:58 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
`foreach_reverse` is a major design mistake considering the fact that it requires a very specific range type, contrary to normal range. For lot of ranges concept of iteration order is simply not defined making `foreach_reverse` useless. And in rare cases when it is needed, it can be replaced with plain `for`.

Hardly does any harm, but definitely not worth putting any efforts into it.

foreach (foreach_reverse) work like a charm for iterating over dchars in a narrow string though.

Reply via email to