On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 09:09 +0200, Jacob Carlborg wrote: > On 2013-08-12 20:06, Russel Winder wrote: > > > This is where Waf has a benefit. SCons can put the build system with the > > project leaving only a Python dependency, but Waf is built for this mode > > of working. > > Why don't they embed Python inside SCons, at least as an option.
SCons is a Python application and so is normally installed in the Python installation. I am sure there could be a Windows installer created, but I guess most Windows people use Visual Studio (*). No package-based system really needs Python shipped with SCons as it is so trivial to install Python and then SCons. OS X comes with Python pre-installed, though it is an old version (**). The reality here is that most major Fortran, C and C++ places are either politically opposed to Python, or are already using it. The former are incapable of using SCons and the latter would get annoyed by another Python installation when they already have one. Most HPC places are using SciPy, most banks now use Python, most engineering places are using Python. (*) SCons can create Visual Studio projects. (**) Anyone using Python earlier than 2.7 is either contractually obliged or nuts. Most sensible folk are already using Python 3.3 or rapidly moving towards it. SCons sadly is not Python 3 compatible. At least not yet, but there are plans. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
