On Monday, 19 August 2013 at 02:33:43 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
2013/8/18 monarch_dodra <monarchdo...@gmail.com>
On Tuesday, 18 June 2013 at 07:58:06 UTC, Kenji Hara wrote:
Inlining should remove performance penalty. Nobody holds the
immediately
called lambda, so it should be treated as a 'scope delegate'.
For that, we
would need to add a section in language spec to support it.
Kenji:
I've been doing some benchmarks recently: Using an "inlined
lambda" seems
to really kill performance, both with or without "-inline"
(tested with
both dmd and gdc).
However, using a named function, and then immediately calling
it, there is
0 performance penalty (both w/ and w/o -inline).
Is this a bug? Can it be fixed? Should I file and ER?
I opened a new bugzilla issue:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10848
And start working for the compiler and doc fix:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dlang.org/pull/372
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/2483
Kenji Hara
As always, thank you *very* much.
