Am 21.08.2013 13:18, schrieb Flamaros:
On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 at 10:30:59 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic
wrote:
On 8/21/13, dennis luehring <dl.so...@gmx.net> wrote:
why use scripting at all - D is blasting fast compiled - so
whats the
benefit of using "another" language - i understand the need
for C++
based systems but in D...
I still don't understand what DQuick has to do with D if you
end up
having to use a separate scripting language to use it. Wouldn't
it
then be more appropriate to post about DQuick in the Lua
newsgroups?
DQuick is for D applications, scripts are just for interfaces.
and why not use D as the scripting language as the remedygames guys do?
or just using Lua because its already running?
Interfaces have to be separate from the application to be edited
by artists or other non developer persons.
but trivial D code looks like trivial Lua code
Here is a link to our model (QtQuick samples) :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8G4U7QWRajg
The main advantage of D is the traits that simplify the binding
of D objects to the script language. Qt use moc to do this and
it's really intrusive, because it extend the c++ syntax. Our
solution is directly based on primitive types of D. Instead of
QtQuick if DQuick isn't ported to a platform, it will easier to
use the native GUI library for this particular platform. With Qt
wrappers have to be create to convert types (QList =>
std::list,...)
thats nice
