On Thursday, 22 August 2013 at 02:06:13 UTC, Tyler Jameson Little wrote:
- array operations (int[] a; int[]b; auto c = a * b;)
- I don't think these are automagically SIMD'd, but there's always hope =D

That isn't allowed. The memory for c must be pre-allocated, and the expression then becomes c[] = a[] * b[];

Is it SIMD'd?

It depends. There is a whole load of hand-written assembler for simple-ish expressions on builtin types, on x86. x86_64 is only supported with 32bit integer types because I haven't finished writing the rest yet...

However, I'm not inclined to do so at the moment as we need a complete overhaul of that system anyway as it's currently a monster*. It needs to be re-implemented as a template instantiated by the compiler, using core.simd. Unfortunately it's not a priority for anyone right now AFAIK.


*
hand-written asm loops. If fully fleshed out there would be:
((aligned + unaligned + legacy mmx) * (x86 + x64) + fallback loop)
  * number of supported expressions * number of different types
of them. Then there's unrolling considerations. See druntime/src/rt/arrayInt.d

Reply via email to