On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:12:44PM +0200, Andrej Mitrovic wrote: > On 8/28/13, Jacob Carlborg <d...@me.com> wrote: > > Yes, it's sometimes usable to be able to declare dummy types like > > this. Especially now when we have UAD's (User Defined Attribute): > > > > enum foo; > > > > @foo bar (); > > Good tip, I used to use structs for this but I wanted something > non-instantiable.
Good idea! I also don't like using structs everywhere just for UDA's. T -- MSDOS = MicroSoft's Denial Of Service