On 7 September 2013 20:04, Jonas Drewsen <nospam4...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> 3. Parameter names need not match. > > > I think we should be conservative and require that parameter names match. > This will ensure that code will not break in the future if named parameter > functionality is added to the language at some point. >
What about the absence of parameter names in the declaration? struct Foo { int bar (string, int, int); } int Foo.bar (string str, int start, int end) { /* ... */ } -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';