On Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 12:08:50 UTC, Simen Kjaeraas wrote:
On 2013-09-08, 14:02, Chang Long wrote:
On Sunday, 8 September 2013 at 10:53:23 UTC, Øivind wrote:
a[c -: d] //D: a[c-d .. c]
I think this should be
a[c -: d] //D: a[c-d+1 .. c+1], e.g. a[5 -: 2] == [a[4],
a[5]]
try &a[base][0..width]
That throws safety out the window for one. If you want safety
and
no new language features, this should work:
a[base..$][0..width]
Thanks
Still a little verbose, but at least you don't have to type the
same things twice.
I guess the double slice will be optimized into a single one at
least for release mode, so there should be no performance
degredation?
