I don't like DIP47, but I think I like this less. The original
DIP this is competing against at least has some sense of
familiarity. This is some weird new thing, and neither DIP really
does anything meaningful.
- new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggregate types Simen Kjaeraas
- Re: new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggregate ... H. S. Teoh
- Re: new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggregate ... Tove
- Re: new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggregate ... Jesse Phillips
- Re: new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggreg... Simen Kjaeraas
- Re: new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggregate ... w0rp
- Re: new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggregate ... Jacob Carlborg
- Re: new DIP48: Interface specifications for aggreg... Simen Kjaeraas