On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 20:08:44 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:04:20PM +0200, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 11 September 2013 at 19:58:36 UTC, H. S. Teoh
wrote:
>I disagree. I think it's more readable to use a consistent
>prefix,
>like kw... or kw_... (e.g. kw_int, kw_return, etc.), so that
>it's
>clear you're referring to token types, not the actual keyword.
Not unless you want to change the style guide and break
existing
Phobos code ;)
How would that break Phobos code? Phobos code doesn't even use
std.d.lexer right now.
Phobos code must conform its style guide. You can't change it
without changing existing Phobos code that relies on it.
Inconsistent style is worst of all options.
