On 13 September 2013 22:18, John Colvin <john.loughran.col...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, 13 September 2013 at 16:27:11 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote: >> >> On Sep 13, 2013 9:53 AM, "Russel Winder" <rus...@winder.org.uk> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 14:56 +0200, Sönke Ludwig wrote: >>> […] >>> > Regarding the dub music genre, it has to be said that > although it is >>> > the >>> > root for dubstep and in turn ... brostep, it's usually not > really >>> > comparable result-wise and I have a strong desire to avoid > putting >>> > the >>> > word "step" somewhere in proximity of "DUB" ;) >>> >>> Perhaps this is the last word on the dubstep issue :-) >>> >>> http://www.mazbox.com/synths/dubstep/ >>> >> >> Someone should port to D. In fact that's one thing I'd definitely would >> like to start a case for - using D in audio processing (eg: effects, >> synths >> :-) >> >> Regards > > > Me too. Unfortunately the whole pro-audio plugin industry is completely > wrapped around steinbergs little finger, doing everything as VSTs in c++.
Perhaps you haven't heard of LV2? http://lv2plug.in/ -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';