On Saturday, 28 September 2013 at 18:32:51 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
I am fine with pushing that feature as an entirely new release
(eg.
2.065). What I'm concerned about are that we've had 4 months of
adding *other* features, bug fixing, and other changes in the D
frontend that need to be sync'd up.
I agree that it at least makes sense to make release branch to
start slowly working towards fixing regressions and stabilizing
stuff.
Point two, shared library support in D is not transferable to
gdc/ldc
- so it's not even a beneficial feature in my eyes.
I thought it is a temporary limitation (I am very interested in
loading D plugins from C/C++ programs). Are there any fundamental
issues that prevent it?
