Walter Bright Wrote: > Jason House wrote: > > there's already someone working on getting that patch into gdb. > > Great! > > > I've > > been trying lately to play with the dmd -gc output so that gdb > > recognizes it properly. > > dumpobj will pretty-print the compiler debug output. It's a handy tool.
Any tips/links on usage and output interpretation would be appreciated. I've never read the dwarf spec and have no idea what should be in debug info. > > I'm not very far, and my queries in #gdb have > > gone unanswered :( > > That's normal. But the source to GDB is available, and that's usually a > lot better source of information. I prefer it to asking questions and > getting incorrect answers back :-( the last time someone helped me on #gdb, they were extremely helpful and knowledgable. I'm hoping for a similar experience. It'd likely speed up my efforts 5 fold. I won't hold my breath though.