On 10/4/2013 11:32 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-10-04 20:10, Brian Schott wrote:
"lexer.d is 86% covered"
Do we have a minimum coverage level?
No, but any "low hanging fruit" uncovered lines need to get test cases added,
i.e. there needs to be some sort of justification for lines not covered.
In general, I'd say we need to be shooting for >= 95%.
If you look at phobos' win32.mak, which lists coverage percentages for the
various phobos modules, a lot of phobos modules are very inadequately covered.
