Re: Value type, ref type, how about something in between?

[The Anh Tran]

Ary Borenszweig wrote:
Isn't pointers for that?
3.
class Outer {
  S* ss; // Wanted ref, got ref.
}
4.
structOuter {
  S* s; // Wanted ref, got ref.
}

Best regards,
Ary

Thanks. But in SafeD, no pointer is allowed. (Not a real issue right now.)

This incomplete ref storage type just bug me. I would like to have 
something that 'complete' + nice.