On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 08:37:49 +1000, Derek Parnell wrote: > > Are you honestly suggesting that the sequence of > > Expression ".." Expression "+1" > > be recognized by the tokenizer as meaning Inclusive-End-Range?
I'm pretty sure he just meant for his brain. I happen to agree. I generally like the mathematical [1,7) syntax, but I think I'd have a hard time reading that in code. Then again, there was mention of needing int.max+1 to be a special case.
