On 28 October 2013 06:46, Peter Alexander <peter.alexander...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 20:30:05 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: > >> Yah, something like that. I found align(NNN) underspecified and >> underpowered for my work with allocators. As a simple matter, NNN must be a >> literal, not a compile-time expression. You can't even write e.g. >> align(size_t.alignof), which is fairly basic. >> > > Yeah I noticed the literal requirement as well and thought it was quite > odd... > I reported that as a deficiency over a year ago, I recall discussion, and thought it was to be fixed. Guess it didn't eventuate.
