Jarrett Billingsley, el 7 de julio a las 23:40 me escribiste: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Walter > Bright<newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote: > > Jarrett Billingsley wrote: > >> > >> Totally agree. They're cruft that just complicate lexical analysis. > > > > Not a significant issue, as the code to lex it is done, works, and is > > readily available. > > I'm not going to argue this anymore.
I will =) That's not a good enough reason. Having *one* front-end (lexer/parser/semantic analizer) is not good enough. D was supposed to make this easy to encourage different implementations. If the D specs are twisted and making a new lexer is... confusing, I think that's a failure. -- Leandro Lucarella (luca) | Blog colectivo: http://www.mazziblog.com.ar/blog/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- FALTAN 325 DIAS PARA LA PRIMAVERA -- Crónica TV
