On Sunday, 10 November 2013 at 11:32:45 UTC, Robert wrote:
On Sunday, 10 November 2013 at 10:37:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg
wrote:
On 2013-11-09 23:50, Robert wrote:
1
Nice. But you trade it for protection having a default value,
making the
syntax more verbose in the general case.
You can overload it:
template signal (string name, Args...)
Smartass! ;-) Of course this would work, not bad! I am not sure
whether this additional wrapper it is worth its salt, but it is
definitely a nice alternative. I will absolutely think about
it. Thanks!
You can use this syntax:
template signal (ProtectionType protection =
ProtectionType.private_, string name, Args...)
{
mixin(signalImpl!(Args)(name, protection));
}
enum ProtectionType
{
none,
private_,
//...
}
It combines both Jacob's suggestions.
Also, it looks like that you don't need `string mixin` at all.
You can use `static if`.
