On Wednesday, 13 November 2013 at 22:34:02 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 11/13/2013 2:18 PM, deadalnix wrote:
Was is missing is the capability to look into the lazy parameter's ast and act
accordingly.

Here you can wrap something around code, not generation code depending on passed
code.

That's correct. But you can look into the AST with expression templates. So, expression templates combined with lazy arguments and mixin templates may fill the problem space.

Expression templates are limited to expression and require to use its own set of types. Still the idea has some merits.

Reply via email to