Don: >Let's get everything on the table.< Thank you for this thread, Don, recently I too have tried to start something like it :-)
> - Multithreading (I): Will Bartosz's proposal be accepted (in some form)? > - Multithreading (II): Will some form of message parsing be included? > - Operator overloading. "completely redone" (?) > - opImplicitCast > - is T[new] still going to happen? > - Phobos I/O -- Andrei has stated that he wants to completely rewrite it. > - Unimplemented features -- safe D, contract inheritance. > - Andrei once said that he wants to get rid of new (!) > - The Tango license issue needs to be sorted to the extent that Andrei > and Walter feel they can safely look at the Tango code; OR we can decide > that's not going to happen, and change the strategy for the Tango/Phobos > relationship. Some other things that may be necessary for D2: - making D2 fitter for the LLVM back-end; - fixing and improving the import semantics; - separating arrays and slices? - removing "Substitution failure is not an error"? - maybe built-in rectangular arrays? Or a more flexible operator overload syntax to implement them. - maybe improving the data parallelism features. Bye, bearophile
